20 March 2007

i'm not the only one

i've been wondering if i should equate government-run health care with government-run health care. there's something that keeps niggling at me, but i can't put my finger on it.


  1. Would I be alone in thinking that government-FUNDED health care wouldn't be so bad, but government-RUN health care has been proven to suck. Sort of like the difference between publicly-funded education and state-run education.

  2. funded/run ends up being the same thing when you chuck politicians into the mix. they expect action(!) for their money. do you honestly believe they could resist the opportunity to control more aspects of our lives?